Imperial Prosecution Bureau
Imperial Prosecution Bureau · Judgment: JMO-0010
| Court | Imperial Prosecution Bureau · Judgment |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-04 |
| Published | JMO-0010 |
| Keywords | Criminal law.Attempted murder.Sentencing.Border incident.Evidence |
| Summary | The State prosecuted belmov after a complaint that the user drove a tank into the border with a civilian inside on August 4, 2026. The court received an exhibit described as "All evidence of the crimes" and the record contains statements concerning disrespect for border authority and possible threats. The court found the defendant guilty of attempted murder and, citing evidence of guilt and the defendant's rank and position, sentenced him to 125 Loyalty Jacks; other requested charges were not recorded as decided in the judgment. |
| Procedural history | Complaint filed; exhibit entered; matter processed by clerk; appearances noted for counsel for larpinqs and counsel for belmov; the bench proceeded through summons, counsel, trial and deliberation; judgement entered and the case closed. |
| Parties | The State: larpinqs Defendant: belmov Prosecution: lavenderZOMG Defence: lavenderZOMG |
| Author | PlatinumSider |
| Last updated | 2026-08-04 |
| References in the text | None cited |
(1)
Judge PlatinumSider: The case concerns the State's prosecution of belmov arising from an incident on August 4, 2026, when the user is alleged to have driven a tank into the border with a civilian inside.
(2)
The complaint on file states: "The user drove a tank into the border with a civilian inside of it. August 4 2026." The recorded desired charges included a range of allegations but the formal charge field is noted as "none recorded" in the record.
(3)
Procedural entries show that the complaint was filed and an exhibit described as "All evidence of the crimes" was entered into the record. The sequence of entries thereafter is set out in the file.
(4)
The procedural history in the record records that the user attempted to disrespect my authority over the border and made statements that could be or could not be considered threats after the clips end. That phrasing appears in the file as part of the material on record.
(5)
The record further notes passing of the file by a clerk and appearances for counsel for larpinqs and counsel for belmov before the bench. The file records movement through stages described as Summoned, Counsel, Trial and Deliberation.
(6)
The record contains the statement: "This was all preventable if Larpinq didn't pull the Lever, we were simply passing through for a propaganda video to get a group to merge with Octavium, the first tank was let through no problem but for some unknown reason larpinqs decided to pull the lever on the second tank sending not only the tank but the civilian into the pit too." The file does not state who made this statement beyond its inclusion in the procedural sequence.
(7)
After trial and deliberation the judgement entered states: "Guilty of attempted murder · Evidence showed his guilt, due to his rank and position he is given 125 LJs." The court's factual assessment in the file is summarized in that entry.
(8)
The material on file lists several desired charges including interfering with lawful officers, attempted murder, capital criminal action, attempted damage to property and exploiting/cheating. The record does not show formal adjudication of the other listed charges.
(9)
No statutes, articles or prior case law are cited in the record before this court. The file contains no reference to legal provisions or precedent relied on in the written entries.
(10)
The judgement entry concludes with the verdict and sentence as stated and the file records the matter as moved on to Closed. Other matters common to disposition such as costs or release conditions are Not stated in the record.
CONCLUSION:
1. The defendant belmov is found guilty of attempted murder.
2. Sentence: 125 Loyalty Jacks (125 LJs).
3. The judgement entry records that evidence showed the defendant's guilt and cites the defendant's rank and position as basis for the imposed sentence.
4. No formal disposition on the other desired charges is recorded in the judgment.
5. Costs: Not stated in the record.
6. Case status: Closed.
An official decision of the Judicial Ministry of Octavium. The complete working file of this case, with its hearing record, is held at the Ministry.
The public law database of the Imperium of Octavium. Laws passed by the Senate and the decisions of the courts enter this register automatically. No sign-in is required.
LOVDATA · OCTAVIUM